Smith/Waters Debate: Paul’s Teaching on MDR

Waters' First Affirmative

Proposition: In the New Testament, the apostle Paul teaches that all competent adults, including the divorced, may marry.

I am happy to join with my friend, J.T. Smith, in this discussion of Paul's teachings that relate to who has a right to have a marriage. I believe if it were not for misinterpretation of Jesus' teachings, and the consequent obligation to "harmonize" Paul's teachings with what some assume Jesus taught, brethren generally would have no problem with Paul's precept to let the “unmarried” marry. Remember, in our previous debate, after I brought up some of Paul's teachings, brother Smith refused to answer because Paul’s teachings did not relate to the proposition at hand. That was fine, but will he need you, the reader, to assume he won that debate as he explains Paul’s teachings? Will he be forced to use what he believes to be Jesus' teaching as a foundation, which does not relate to the proposition at hand, to explain Paul’s teaching? I predict that he will.

 

In at least three epistles Paul gives information that should help us fully understand the answer to the question, “Who may marry?” We shall show that the gist of Paul's teachings is "Let those who need marriage to avoid fornication, or who are burning in lust, marry if they are of age" (1 Cor 7:2, 9, 36). Paul's teachings are easily understood and easy to obey once a person learns that the errant view teaching that Jesus changed the Law allowing the divorced to marry (Deut. 24:1-2), is neither scriptural nor acceptable. Which is easier, doing nothing or “forbidding to marry”? The latter results in disaster for families, individuals, churches and those who are guilty of this unscriptural doctrine that benefits only Satan.

 

1 Corinthians 7

Paul addressed questions regarding who may marry. We might find some misunderstanding of Jesus' teachings to Jews regarding a specific and unique problem, but now Paul is addressing Christians. Christians today have the same responsibility to hear and obey Paul, who wrote by inspiration, as did the Corinthians.

 

Things to Observe

First, we must keep in mind that nowhere in Paul's teaching is he saying marriage is not good. Such would contradict God who said, "It is not good that man should be alone." Paul also said, "Marriage is honorable…and the bed undefiled..." Thus, statements that might appear to be to the contrary must be understood in light of the context and the situation, which he describes as "the present distress." Therefore, we must understand that Paul gives advice that is applicable during the time of the “present distress” that was not intended to be applicable for all time, such as, “I would that all men were even as I.” This is evident by the fact that he goes on to say that if marriage is needed to avoid sin, a person is to be allowed to marry.

 

Second, nowhere in Paul's teachings does he even hint that a divorce has to be for fornication before it frees the parties to marry. This is something that has been presumed that Jesus taught. But such teaching has Moses against God, Jesus against Moses, Paul against Jesus, Paul against himself and Christians teaching an unjust doctrine. If God had intended for us to understand that only those who initiate divorce for fornication may marry another, would he not have inspired Paul to teach the same in no uncertain terms? In view of the fact that such teaching encourages a race to the courthouse, can we not see the imprudence of it, and therefore understand that it is not from God?

 

1 Corinthians 7:1-2

"Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman. Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband."

 

In the above text, Paul not only commands any who would object to a man or woman’s having a spouse not to do so, but he also gives the reason this is necessary, which should help us to understand and accept the command. Also note that the text says "every man." Thus, Paul does not exclude anyone who needs marriage "to avoid fornication" and he is very specific in his command.

 

Verses 7-9

"For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that. I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I. But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn."

 

Paul acknowledged that some do not have the gift of celibacy as he did, and therefore he commands any who would object to a man or woman’s marrying to "let them marry." And, once again, he gives the reason: "for it is better to marry than to burn in lust."

 

Now, notice whom is addressed: the "unmarried." Unless divorce does not do what God intended it to do, divorcees are “unmarried,” i.e., they are “single” and without a spouse.

 

Verses 27-28

"Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife. But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned; and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned. Nevertheless such shall have trouble in the flesh: but I spare you."

 

Paul advises those who are bound unto a woman (meaning married) to seek not to get a divorce (regardless of what the spouse may have done), and if you are loosed (divorced according to law) seek not to take another wife. But if you do (because of needs previously discussed) you do not sin in marrying, even though you could be spared trouble by remaining single.

 

Verse 36

"But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry."

 

Once again, Paul stresses the importance of marriage and the reason for it. Also note that he said "any man"--not just those who have never married, or those who divorce their spouse for some particular reason that is absent in Paul’s writings.

 

1 Tim. 4:1-4

In this text Paul warns that in the future some would be guilty of "forbidding to marry," which would be a sinful activity. To whom this prophecy refers is not as important as the fact that anyone, from that point forward, who refuses people (who need marriage) the right to marry is committing the same sin.

 



Next Article


Return to Total Health